Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1038120210540030379
Clinical Endoscopy
2021 Volume.54 No. 3 p.379 ~ p.389
Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Garg Rajat

Singh Amandeep
Aggarwal Manik
Bhalla Jaideep
Mohan Babu P.
Burke Carol
Rustagi Tarun
Chahal Prabhleen
Abstract
Background/Aims: Recent studies have reported the favorable outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) for colorectal polyps. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of UEMR for nonpedunculated polyps ¡Ã10 mm.

Methods: We performed a comprehensive search of multiple databases (through May 2020) to identify studies reporting the outcomes of UEMR for ¡Ã10 mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. The assessed outcomes were recurrence rate on the first follow-up, en bloc resection, incomplete resection, and adverse events after UEMR.

Results: A total of 1276 polyps from 16 articles were included in our study. The recurrence rate was 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3?12) and 5.9% (95% CI, 3.6?9.4) for nonpedunculated polyps ¡Ã10 and ¡Ã20 mm, respectively. For nonpedunculated polyps ¡Ã10 mm, the en bloc resection, R0 resection, and incomplete resection rates were 57.7% (95% CI, 42.4?71.6), 58.9% (95% CI, 42.4?73.6), and 1.5% (95% CI, 0.8?2.6), respectively. The rates of pooled adverse events, intraprocedural bleeding, and delayed bleeding were 7.0%, 5.4%, and 2.9%, respectively. The rate of perforation and postpolypectomy syndrome was 0.8%.

Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that UEMR for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ¡Ã10 mm is safe and effective with a low rate of recurrence.
KEYWORD
Underwater, Colorectal, EMR, Polyps, Resection
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø